منابع مشابه
Knowing the crowd within: Metacognitive limits on combining multiple judgments.
We investigated how decision-makers use multiple opportunities to judge a quantity. Decision-makers undervalue the benefit of combining their own judgment with an advisor's, but theories disagree about whether this bias would apply to combining several of one's own judgments. Participants estimated percentage answers to general knowledge questions (e.g., What percent of the world's population u...
متن کاملKnowing How vs . Knowing That
More than forty years after Gilbert Ryle published his paper on "Knowing How and Knowing That" in 1945, 1 the problem of practical knowledge has still failed to establish for itself a secure position in the field of problems dealt with by analytic philosophers. Thus even today it can safely be asserted that it is discursive or theoretical knowledge, knowledge linguistically expressed, above all...
متن کاملEmancipatory knowing: Hidden necessity
Background & Aim: Knowledge patterns in nursing are key foundation elements for the development of knowledge and practice. Carper identified four fundamental knowledge patterns; empirical, personal, ethical and aesthetic. Chain and Kramer added the pattern of emancipatory knowledge to Carperchr('39')s patterns. The pattern of emancipatory knowledge in nursing has been neglected. The aim of this...
متن کاملKnowing More - From Global to Local Correspondence
Modal correspondence theory is a powerful and effective way to guarantee that adding specific syntactic axioms to a modal logic is mirrored by requiring ‘corresponding’ properties of the underlying Kripke models. However, such axioms not only quantify over all formulas, but they are also global in the sense that the corresponding semantic property is assumed to hold for all states. However, in ...
متن کاملknowing and discerning valid judicial precedents from rescinded one
in modern legal systems there are a variety of sources of law. judicial precedent is one of the legal sources; thus, precedents of supreme court, like enactments of parliament, are enforceable in courts. this similarity between precedents and acts impose many problems as role of supreme court in interpretation of laws. but the most important problem is the possibility of changing previous pre...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Nordisk politiforskning
سال: 2018
ISSN: 1894-8693
DOI: 10.18261/issn.1894-8693-2018-01-03